摘要
摘要目的探讨驱血带联合微创剥离器治疗大隐静脉曲张的疗效.方法回顾性分析２００９年９月至２０１３年１２月收治３３８例大隐静脉曲张患者,分别采用传统金属剥脱器、高位结扎联合血管腔内激光、驱血带联合微创剥脱器治疗,其中传统金属剥脱器(传统组)１１８例,高位结扎联合血管腔内激光(激光组)９２例,驱血带联合微创剥脱器(微创组)１２８例,比较３组在手术时间,术中出血量,住院时间,术后并发症发生率,复发率方面的差异.结果微创组及激光组与传统组相比,手术时间、术中出血量及住院天数显著降低(P＜０．０１).微创组较激光组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后复发率方面,显著降低(P＜０．O１);住院天数方面无显著差异(P＞０．０５).三组术后早期并发症发生率无明显差异(P＞０．０５).结论驱血带联合微创剥离器是治疗大隐静脉曲张的有效方法,值得临床广泛推广.关键词大隐静脉曲张;传统金属剥脱器;血管腔内激光;驱血带;微创剥脱器AclinicalreseachoftheblooddrivebeldandminimallyinvasivestripperinthetreatmentofgreatsaphenousveinvaricosityFanYing,ChenYu,Gong,XiongYixiang(YibinSecondPeople＇sHospitalYibinSichuan６４４０００)AbstractObjectiveToexploretheclinicaleffectoftheblooddrivebeldandminimallyinvasivestripperinthetreatmentofgreatsaphenousveinvaricosity(GSVV)．MethodsToretrospectiveanalysis３３８casesGSVVfromSeptember２００９toDecember２０１３．AllsamlpleswererespectivelytreatedbytraditionalstripＧper(TS１１８cases),endogenouslasercombinedwithhighligation(ELCHL９２cases)orblooddrivebeldandminimallyinvasivestripper(MIS１２８cases)．Itwascomparedeachgroupthattimeofsurgery,amountofbleeding,meanlengthofhospitalstay,postoperativecomplicationsandrecurrencerate．ResultstimeofsurＧgery,amountofbleeding,meanlengthofhospitalstayinMISandELCHLgroupswasnotableshorterthaninTSgroup(P＜０．０１)．Timeofsurgery,amountofbleedingandrecurrencerateinMISgroupswasnotableshorterthaninELCHLgroup(P＜０．０１);meanlengthofhospitalstaywassimilar(P＞o．０５)．PostopＧerativecomplicationswassimilarinthreegroups(P＞o．０５)．ConclusionItisaneffectivemethodfortreatmentofGSVVwiththeblooddrivebeltandminimallyinvasivKeesytrwioprpdesr,worthclinicalpopularizingwidely．Greatsaphenousveinvaricosity;Traditionalstripper;Endogenouslaser;Blooddrivebeld;Minimallyinvasivestripper中图分类号R６５４．３文献标识码B文章编号１００１－５３０２(２０１５)０９－０６７４－０２
出版日期
2015年09月19日（中国期刊网平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）
